This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
boardmeetingagenda:2015-11-19 [2015/12/17 17:47] vrana54 |
boardmeetingagenda:2015-11-19 [2015/12/17 21:44] (current) vrana54 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
* Mat cleaning services wil lneed ket access | * Mat cleaning services wil lneed ket access | ||
* They will also clean bathrooms | * They will also clean bathrooms | ||
- | * Cintas | + | * Cintas |
- | =====Any topics | + | **Warning for Charles S** |
+ | * Tom suggested a warning for (6) months | ||
+ | * Lance mentioned that Charles feels that he hasn't received adequate time to defend himself. He feels the process has been unfair. Charles acknowledged that he received the warning. | ||
+ | * DL said that Charles had agreed that he had taken the stand and it should have gone to the hack rack instead of being put in the lost and found | ||
+ | * DL mentioned that Charles has been good on other things | ||
+ | * Dan mentioned that Charles told him that Charles had willingly taken the stand to "teach a lesson" | ||
+ | * Charles joined the meeting | ||
+ | * Tom summarized the event that caused the warning to be issued to Charles | ||
+ | * Charles mentioned that he didn't see a parking permit on the stand. He doesn' | ||
+ | * Charles returned the stand to the member when they asked him where it was | ||
+ | * The member grabbed the stand from the lost and found. She accused Charles of theft and left the room. Charles offered to talk to her but she refused. | ||
+ | * Charles and Dan discussed the event right after and Dan inquired why he didn't put a red ticket on the item. | ||
+ | * When asked why Charles only removed the stand and not the remaining items on the table, Charles mentioned that he became busy and got distracted. | ||
+ | * Dan asked Charles why he didn't just put a red ticket on the stand | ||
+ | * Charles responded that the policy is inconsistent and Charles contributes a lot to space cleanup | ||
+ | * Dan mentioned that there was a parking permit on the table. | ||
+ | * Charles mentioned that he did not see the ticket | ||
+ | * Charles believes that Tom and Joe break space policies all the time | ||
+ | * Dan asked if Charles is not on the mailing list, how does he plan on informing other members | ||
+ | * Charles mentioned that there are too many emails on the mailing list and he isn't interested in it. The list has poor conduct. | ||
+ | * Charles believes that he followed the rule as expected. He believes that the short notice is unfair. | ||
+ | * Lance mentioned that no one is talking about suspension at this time. He added that Charles does a lot for the space. | ||
+ | * Lance suggested that Charles use the abridged mailing list. | ||
+ | * Charles apologized for causing concerns | ||
+ | * DL asked if Charles could have posted an email to the members-only list after moving the stand | ||
+ | * Charles said that the red ticket signature should be removed to avoid confrontation | ||
+ | * DL said prints the red tickets with her signature since it is her job to deal with stuff and move things | ||
+ | * Charles said that we as members should be empowered to ticket. He believes that contacting DL is adding a layer of bureaucracy | ||
+ | * Charles agreed that a red ticket should have been issued in this situation | ||
+ | |||
+ | * |