User Tools

Site Tools


boardmeetingagenda:2015-11-19

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
boardmeetingagenda:2015-11-19 [2015/12/17 17:43]
vrana54
boardmeetingagenda:2015-11-19 [2015/12/17 21:44] (current)
vrana54
Line 120: Line 120:
     * **Previous action item from Tom: **Call mat services to get rental costs      * **Previous action item from Tom: **Call mat services to get rental costs 
     * **Previous action item from DL: **Provide dollar numbers for purchasing new carpets      * **Previous action item from DL: **Provide dollar numbers for purchasing new carpets 
 +      * Mat cleaning services wil lneed ket access 
 +      * They will also clean bathrooms
 +      * Cintas provides the best value
  
-=====Any topics from members who are present=====+**Warning for Charles S** 
 +  * Tom suggested a warning for (6) months 
 +  * Lance mentioned that Charles feels that he hasn't received adequate time to defend himself. He feels the process has been unfair. Charles acknowledged that he received the warning.  
 +  * DL said that Charles had agreed that he had taken the stand and it should have gone to the hack rack instead of being put in the lost and found 
 +  * DL mentioned that Charles has been good on other things 
 +  * Dan mentioned that Charles told him that Charles had willingly taken the stand to "teach a lesson" 
 +  * Charles joined the meeting 
 +  * Tom summarized the event that caused the warning to be issued to Charles 
 +  * Charles mentioned that he didn't see a parking permit on the stand. He doesn't read the mailing list so he did not see the call for the missing stand. 
 +  * Charles returned the stand to the member when they asked him where it was 
 +  * The member grabbed the stand from the lost and found. She accused Charles of theft and left the room. Charles offered to talk to her but she refused. 
 +  * Charles and Dan discussed the event right after and Dan inquired why he didn't put a red ticket on the item. 
 +  * When asked why Charles only removed the stand and not the remaining items on the table, Charles mentioned that he became busy and got distracted. 
 +  * Dan asked Charles why he didn't just put a red ticket on the stand 
 +  * Charles responded that the policy is inconsistent and Charles contributes a lot to space cleanup 
 +  * Dan mentioned that there was a parking permit on the table.  
 +  * Charles mentioned that he did not see the ticket 
 +  * Charles believes that Tom and Joe break space policies all the time 
 +  * Dan asked if Charles is not on the mailing list, how does he plan on informing other members when he moves an item in this manner. What would have happened if no one had asked Charles anything and the item had been subsequently removed from the building? 
 +  * Charles mentioned that there are too many emails on the mailing list and he isn't interested in it. The list has poor conduct. 
 +  * Charles believes that he followed the rule as expected. He believes that the short notice is unfair. 
 +  * Lance mentioned that no one is talking about suspension at this time. He added that Charles does a lot for the space. 
 +  * Lance suggested that Charles use the abridged mailing list. 
 +  * Charles apologized for causing concerns 
 +  * DL asked if Charles could have posted an email to the members-only list after moving the stand 
 +  * Charles said that the red ticket signature should be removed to avoid confrontation 
 +  * DL said prints the red tickets with her signature since it is her job to deal with stuff and move things 
 +  * Charles said that we as members should be empowered to ticket. He believes that contacting DL is adding a layer of bureaucracy 
 +  * Charles agreed that a red ticket should have been issued in this situation 
 +  
 +  * 
boardmeetingagenda/2015-11-19.1450374237.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/12/17 17:43 by vrana54