User Tools

Site Tools


boardmeetingagenda:2014-10-23

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
boardmeetingagenda:2014-10-23 [2014/10/27 03:21]
branth
boardmeetingagenda:2014-10-23 [2014/10/27 03:25] (current)
branth
Line 147: Line 147:
           - Brant asked if the BOD should vote on Area Champions and their ability to sign parking passes           - Brant asked if the BOD should vote on Area Champions and their ability to sign parking passes
           - Ultimately, the group agreed to table a vote until later in the evening           - Ultimately, the group agreed to table a vote until later in the evening
-      ​- 8:01 Proposed changes to the Green Parking Permit/Red Parking Ticket System +    ​- 8:01 Proposed changes to the Green Parking Permit/Red Parking Ticket System 
-           Lance presented his proposed changes and read from the projector screen+      - Lance presented his proposed changes and read from the projector screen
       - 8:02 Item 1       - 8:02 Item 1
           - Proposed text: //"Any member can place a green parking ticket on their project. ​ A green parking ticket not signed by a board member/area champion is good for 24 hours. ​ This green ticket is intended for things like glue or paint drying or other critical, short-term, project states. ​ It is the member'​s responsibility to try to put their project in an out the the way area when they place a green tag on it.  Projects should not be green tagged unless it is a critical stage or the member expects to return in 12 hours or less.  Working on a project every day does not mean that you have a right to have it on public work space when you are not there."//​           - Proposed text: //"Any member can place a green parking ticket on their project. ​ A green parking ticket not signed by a board member/area champion is good for 24 hours. ​ This green ticket is intended for things like glue or paint drying or other critical, short-term, project states. ​ It is the member'​s responsibility to try to put their project in an out the the way area when they place a green tag on it.  Projects should not be green tagged unless it is a critical stage or the member expects to return in 12 hours or less.  Working on a project every day does not mean that you have a right to have it on public work space when you are not there."//​
Line 239: Line 239:
           - **VOTE: 7 Board Members approved this new policy**           - **VOTE: 7 Board Members approved this new policy**
               - The BOD agreed that the policy will go into effect 2 weeks after the Membership is notified (this has yet to be sent to the Membership)               - The BOD agreed that the policy will go into effect 2 weeks after the Membership is notified (this has yet to be sent to the Membership)
-      ​- 8:55 Area Champions  +  ​- 8:55 Area Champions  
-          - The group asked to table this discussion since the meeting had run long +      - The group asked to table this discussion since the meeting had run long 
-          - Tiffany indicated she had suggestions for how to best define Area Champions duties +      - Tiffany indicated she had suggestions for how to best define Area Champions duties 
-          - Brant reiterated the vote proposed earlier: Should Area Champions be able to sign green parking permits for their respective areas as well as extend their authority to sign permits for the middle of the East Room? +      - Brant reiterated the vote proposed earlier: Should Area Champions be able to sign green parking permits for their respective areas as well as extend their authority to sign permits for the middle of the East Room? 
-          - **VOTE: 5 Board Members approved, 2 rejected (Vishal and Tiffany)**+      - **VOTE: 5 Board Members approved, 2 rejected (Vishal and Tiffany)**
           - Tiffany expressed concern over this policy creating more work for her           - Tiffany expressed concern over this policy creating more work for her
           - Lance and others agreed to review in one month and assess its impact           - Lance and others agreed to review in one month and assess its impact
-      ​- 8:58 Future Board Meeting Dates+  ​- 8:58 Future Board Meeting Dates
           - Once or twice monthly considered           - Once or twice monthly considered
           - Lance suggested we meet once per month with the option to meet a second time if the first meeting runs long           - Lance suggested we meet once per month with the option to meet a second time if the first meeting runs long
Line 260: Line 260:
             - **With the option to hold a meeting immediately the following Thursday should the agenda necessitate it**             - **With the option to hold a meeting immediately the following Thursday should the agenda necessitate it**
           - **All 7 Board Members approved**           - **All 7 Board Members approved**
-      ​- 9:04 Maker Faire 2015 Planning+  ​- 9:04 Maker Faire 2015 Planning
           - JimK addressed the Board            - JimK addressed the Board 
               - Jim noted he was not looking for a vote on anything right now               - Jim noted he was not looking for a vote on anything right now
boardmeetingagenda/2014-10-23.txt · Last modified: 2014/10/27 03:25 by branth